KLM Royal Dutch Airlines complaints: comments, page 12
2,012 comments
No reason given
I was traveling on a single booking from Belgrade β Amsterdam β Cancun, together with five other passengers under the same reservation. Due to the cancellation of the BelgradeβAmsterdam segment, I arrived at my final destination with a 3 days delay and incurred EUR 150 in nonβrefundable hotel costs, which were previously submitted. Out of six passengers traveling on the same booking reference, under the same itinerary and affected by the same cancellation: Three passengers received EUR 600 compensation, as follows: β’ Ivana LjubiΔ BajiΔ β’ Vesna Milin β’ Lana ObrkneΕΎeviΔ Three of us were declined, including my case: β’ Jelena ZeΔeviΔ β’ Zorica KrstiΔ β’ Natasa PantoviΔ (me) This represents a clear inconsistency in decisionβmaking and raises concerns of unequal and potentially discriminatory treatment.- Belgrade-Cancun
- Economy
Anonymous member
Belgrade-Cancun
Economy
unequal and discriminatory treatment
I am contacting you regarding the reconsideration of my compensation claim for the cancellation of flight KL1982 on 10 January. My itinerary consisted of the following single booking: Belgrade β Amsterdam β Cancun. Three passengers traveling with me on the same booking reference have already received EUR 600 compensation for the same disruption, which is why I kindly ask for a review of my case again. Although the journey started outside the EU, it included travel through an EU airport (Amsterdam). According to established CJEU case law (e.g., C 537/17 and C 561/20), directly connecting flights within one booking must be considered as a single unit, and Regulation (EC) 261/2004 therefore applies to the entire journey. The reason provided for the cancellation of the BelgradeβAmsterdam flight was a cabin crew issue. As confirmed by CJEU jurisprudence, crew shortages or staffing issues are not considered extraordinary circumstances, as they fall within the normal responsibilities of an air carrier. Because of the cancellation, I reached my final destination with a significant delay, and due to the total distance of the journey, I am entitled to compensation of EUR 600 under Article 7(1)(c). Additionally, I incurred EUR 150 in non-refundable hotel costs, which I previously submitted with my claim. I would also like to highlight a serious inconsistency in the handling of our groupβs claims. All six passengers traveled under the same booking reference, on the same itinerary, and were affected by the same cancellation. Three passengers received EUR 600 compensation: β’ Ivana LjubiΔ BajiΔ β’ Vesna Milin β’ Lana ObrkneΕΎeviΔ Three of us were declined: β’ Jelena ZeΔeviΔ β’ Zorica KrstiΔ β’ Natasa PantoviΔ (my case) Such different outcomes for identical cases within the same booking raise concerns about unequal and potentially discriminatory treatment. Given that all six passengers experienced the exact same disruption, I kindly request that my claim be approved accordingly and processed in line with the compensation already granted to the other three passengers. I would truly appreciate it if my case could be reviewed once more, taking into account the above-mentioned facts and relevant legal framework. Thank you in advance for your attention and assistance. I look forward to hearing from you. Kind regards, Natasa PantovicOverall
discriminatory treatment for some passengers
- Belgrade-Cancun
- Economy
- Stockholm-Los Angeles
- Economy
- Leeds-Zurich
- Economy
- Successful claim
- Hyderabad-Chicago
- Economy
No reason given
On the 29th of September 2025 I boarded a flight from Budapest Hungary to Lagos Nigeria via Amsterdam. The connecting flight from Amsterdam Schipol to Lagos Nigeria was missed due to the Budapest Amsterdam leg being delayed. We were told in the air that our connecting flights would be missed and to contact the service desks on arrival at Amsterdam Schipol. On arrival at Amsterdam I was told that no accommodation was available courtesy of KLM. I was advised to book the closest hotel and informed I would be fully compensated for the missed flight and the hotel costs would be refunded. I stayed at the Sheraton at Amsterdam Schipol which was closest. I was travelling with dogs and pulling around their large travel crate. What has transpired over the last 7 months has been absurd. I have submitted all my documentation to KLM - they have asked for more and it has all been duly handed in. The last 4 attempts have been difficult - KLM customer services reps have asked for the same documentation four times, I have submitted it each time through their customer services portal as well as emailing it to them separately. On each occasion they have claimed not to have received anything and have finally closed my claim. I realised they were stalling and finally decided to use a third party as the entire process was infuriating and time consuming.- Budapest-Lagos
- Economy
- Successful claim
- Mumbai-Toronto
- Economy
- Accra-Edinburgh
- Economy
- Valencia-Ljubljana
- Economy
- Bristol-Cape Town
- Economy
- Claim escalated to airline
- Bristol-Cape Town
- Economy
- Claim escalated to airline
Lesley Faye C
Economy
Delayed Luggage which was lost between Oslo and Ansterdam
As there were two different airlines due to a connecting flight it was an abolsute dilemma as neither airline wanted to be responsible for the lost luggage. No one was keen to follow up but I had to persist to try and locate my luggage which we eventually identifyed that it had been left in Oslo.- Economy
- Loss: β¬86
- Desired solution
Expenses reimbursement
Sainath M
Bangalore-Amsterdam
Economy
My request was abruptly rejected without explanation
We respectfully requested compensation for the 24-hour delay, reimbursement of the additional $300 paid for early arrival, and reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred as a direct result of the delay. However, my claim was rejected on the basis that EC Regulation 261/2004 does not apply to my travel, despite the ticket being booked with and operated by KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and the disruption being caused by the airline. We further requested a detailed explanation and supporting evidence for this rejection. Unfortunately, the case was abruptly closed by customer care without providing any justification or documentation. Additionally, no assistance was offered when I inquired about how to escalate the matter further, leaving the issue unresolved.Overall
Delayed 24 hours and No Compensation
Good Food

- Bangalore-Amsterdam
- Economy
- Loss: β¬435
- Desired solution
Expenses reimbursement
- Seattle-Dubai
- Economy
- Amsterdam-Dammam
- Economy
- Milan-Amsterdam
- Economy
Kylie M
Amsterdam-Austin
Premium economy
Horrendous customer service
Formal Complaint β Mishandled Baggage & Unacceptable Customer Service (PIR: AUSKL14848) I am writing to formally complain about both my delayed baggage and the unacceptable treatment I received from customer service regarding my case (PIR: AUSKL14848). My baggage has been delayed since my recent flight, and I am now being told it is scheduled for a future flight despite previously being told it would be expedited. My tracking system has not been updated to reflect this, leaving me without reliable or consistent information. More concerning, during my most recent call with customer service: - I requested a supervisor due to repeated lack of resolution - The agent responded sarcastically and stated he had the right to hang up - He then disconnected the call while I was actively requesting escalation This behavior is completely unacceptable and unprofessional. Additionally: - I have been repeatedly told to βcall back tomorrowβ without any meaningful progress - Notes allegedly added to my case have not resulted in any action - I am now at risk of departing for another flight without my baggage I am requesting the following: 1. Immediate escalation of my baggage case with confirmed routing and delivery timeline 2. Reimbursement for all necessary expenses incurred due to this delay (receipts will be submitted separately) 3. A formal review of the customer service interaction, including the agent who disconnected the call 4. Appropriate compensation for both the baggage delay and the unacceptable service experience Please treat this as a formal complaint requiring a documented response. I expect confirmation that this issue is being actively handled. Sincerely, KylieOverall
Poor customer service agent over telephone
- Amsterdam-Austin
- Premium economy
- Loss: β¬3000
- Desired solution
Refund
No reason given
The cancellation was claimed to be due to adverse weather, but the decision was taken over 10 hours in advance. The aviation weather forecasts and the actual weather at the time of the flight were well within the capabilities of the aircraft; the airport was not closed or restricted due to the weather and numerous flights departed in the same time period. The claim that the flight was canceled due to weather reasons is probably an excuse to get out of paying the refund. All the alternatives I was provided were for the next day; I had to use a solution with 3 separate flights and I arrived at my destination almost 24 hours late.- Palma de Mallorca-Torino
- Economy
- Claim escalated to airline
Rachel C
Malaga-Amsterdam
Economy
Refund not provided since claim made on 14th April. Cannot understand what the delay is.
Delayed and missed connecting flight meaning an overnight stay in Amsterdam. Still waiting on KLM to refund me for the hotel stay.Overall
Delay
- Malaga-Amsterdam
- Economy
- Loss: β¬453.96
- Desired solution
Expenses reimbursement
- Manchester-Hannover
- Economy
- Manchester-Hannover
- Economy
- Manchester-Hannover
- Economy
No reason given
tion 1 (formal and straightforward): The airline contacted me and informed me that my flight would be delayed. They advised me to submit this claim for compensation. I would like to add that I had to wait for several hours and paid for food at the airport, for which I unfortunately do not have receipts. Additionally, I had to cancel my work shift due to the delay.- Amsterdam-Stockholm
- Economy
- Claim escalated to airline
Chirag S
Amsterdam-Bangalore
Economy
Flight cancellation claims amount
My flight was cancelled couple of times. KLM promised to reimburse for food/stay for both the days. I was only compensated for 1 of the days and not for both of the days. I have followed up with Customer care and followed all the steps suggested by them but haven't received compensation for the 2nd day. Details: My flight was cancelled a couple of times. I had filed 2 separate claims (C-10660974 and C-10660210) for each of the cancellations. C-10660974 of the claims was approved while the C-10660210 was marked as duplicate. The requests are not really duplicate as these are claims for separate days. Compensation amount: INR 40013.14 ( ~363 euros)Overall
Flight cancelled multiple times

- Amsterdam-Bangalore
- Economy
- Loss: β¬730
- Desired solution
Expenses reimbursement
- Madrid-Amsterdam
- Economy
No reason given
My flight got cancelled due to the ongoing conflict in middle east. My flight was on 7 March and return on 15 March, I have still not been refunded for the cancellation of my trip. I have contacted KLM several times and they keep delaying and saying that it will come "next week" since more than a month. Same for booking.com, through which I booked my ticket. There was no action taken despite of calling them many times and I also contacted customer care chat but no action from them either. They keep bouncing the issue to each other. Booking.com says contact KLM, KLM says contact booking.com and none of them seem to have any concrete answer.- Schonefeld-Dubai
- Economy
- Glasgow-San Francisco
- Economy
- Claim escalated to airline
Technical problems
My flight was cancelled around 7 hours before departure via text message and we were given no reason. My daughter and I had already checked in. I immediately tried to contact KLM many times over several hours and days and was not able to reach anyone via phone, WhatsApp or email (I have proof if needed). We were informed that we were automatically booked on the flight two days later. At the airport counter before the flight that we were automatically rescheduled on, I spoke with the KLM staff and they said we would be reimbursed but it is best to apply for that after our flight. I did this as you will see from the records. This cancelled flight caused us to miss the closing ceremony for my family's 70+ year old family business celebrating my 94 year old grandmother who was the founder, work meetings which cost my company money and my daughter's graduation because we had to extend my trip so that I could do the meetings that I missed.- Entebbe-Port-of-spain
- Economy
- Claim escalated to airline
- Bristol-Salt Lake City
- Economy
- Fort Lauderdale-Stockholm
- Economy
- Barcelona-Tallinn-ulemiste International
- Economy
- Successful claim
Kenneth W
Economy
Cancelled flight and no train ticket
Hi, As you know my flight was cancelled. I was rerouted through London on a Saudi flight. I was charged 800 sar for over baggage even though my ticket stated 1 checked in baggage, also charged Β£41 on my return journey at Cardiff airport. At Heathrow no one had a clue about the rail ticket system and I emailed the address given but systems were down. My return flight Cardiff - Amsterdam was cancelled and I was put on a flight 12 hours later. I lost a day's pay at work. Also the Amsterdam to Abu Dhabi was delayed. Not sure how I stand but was informed to write to claim some compensation. Please advise. Kenneth Willan - 5193721443 Flying Blue EMEPH8 - Dammam - Cardiff return 26th March Best Regards. K WillanOverall
No baggage allowed
food
- Economy
- Loss: β¬600
- Desired solution
- Bucharest-Amsterdam
- Economy
- Bucharest-Amsterdam
- Economy
- Bucharest-Gran Canaria
- Economy
- Claim escalated to airline
- Porto-Vilnius
- Economy
- Successful claim
- Cork-Sao Paulo
- Economy
- Cork-Sao Paulo
- Economy
- Cork-Sao Paulo
- Economy
- Claim escalated to airline
Ching Sai Y
Economy
This is formal Letter Before Action - EC261 Compensation Claim
This is formal Letter Before Action - EC261 Compensation Claim, [C-8503555] Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to formally notify you of my intention to commence legal proceedings if my claim is not resolved within 14 days. This claim relates to flight KL1062 from Norwich to Amsterdam on 12 September 2024. Due to the delay of this flight, my husband and I missed our connecting flight and arrived at my final destination at 06:10 on 14 September 2024, instead of the scheduled arrival time of 15:25 on 13 September 2024 - a delay of approximately 15 hours. Under EC Regulation 261/2004, I am therefore entitled to compensation of Euro 600 for each passenger. You have previously rejected my claim on the basis of "extraordinary circumstances" due to weather conditions. However, I do not accept that the circumstances described meet the strict legal threshold required. Weather conditions must be truly exceptional and unavoidable, and the airline must demonstrate that all reasonable measures were taken to prevent the delay. Given the length of the delay and the nature of the disruption described, I do not consider this exemption to be applicable. Please arrange payment of Euro 600 (or GBP equivalent) for each passenger within 14 days of the date of this letter. If I do not receive full payment within this period, I will initiate proceedings via the Money Claim Online service without further notice. I will also seek interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Court Act 1984, as well as court fees. Yours faithfully, Ching Sai Yip- Economy
- Loss: β¬600
- Desired solution
Technical problems
Flight was cancelled due to technical issues after passengers had boarded and not due to weather as airline is claiming- Dublin-Nice
- Economy
Problems at airport
I met the Airline in CDG Paris upon arrival and discovered my connecting flight to Amsterdam had let. They said all the early flights had been booked, so i had to wait for later flights. They gave me another boarding pass, but i spent an additional 10 hours. I was going to pick up my younger sister who was just coming to Europe for the first time. I was supposed to meet up with her in Frankfurt at 1pm and we head straight to her school for registration. I wasted another 10 hours , arrived Frankfurt around 10.45pm while my sister ended up waiting for me for another 17 hours and we both slept at the Terminal 1 train station at Frankurt. We continued our journey at 4am. I just feel we suffered for nothing. I was given a food voucher worth 15euro to have lunch in Paris. I guess i lost the voucher while i was walking around passing time.- Lagos-Frankfurt
- Economy
- Successful claim
No reason given
My itinerary was Dublin (DUB) to Amsterdam (AMS) on KL1142, connecting to AMS-Seoul Incheon (ICN). While KL1142 was delayed, I arrived at the AMS gate for the connecting flight on time and was fully prepared to board. Despite this, KLM staff refused me boarding because they had unilaterally rebooked meβwithout my consent or requestβonto a next-day LOT Polish Airlines flight with an additional layover in Warsaw. This decision caused a ~14-hour arrival delay in Seoul, extra fatigue before critical business meetings, and subsequent baggage loss. Their letter claims the delay was due to "weather conditions" causing a missed connection, qualifying as an extraordinary circumstance. This is inaccurate: I did not miss the connection due to the delayβI reached the gate punctually. The refusal to board constitutes involuntary denied boarding under Article 4 of EU261, not merely a delay under Article 6. Compensation of β¬600 applies for long-haul flights unless the denial was voluntary (it wasn't) or due to my fault (it wasn't). Even if weather contributed to the initial KL1142 delay, public data shows only light rain showers at Dublin Airport on January 28, 2026βnot severe conditions like storms or fog that would exempt liability. Preemptive rebooking is an operational choice inherent to airline activities, not extraordinary.- Dublin-Seoul
- Economy
No reason given
I have contacted them. They said they would pay, but the amount seems low. Additionally, they said the bank account details were incorrect, but now have stopped responding entirely- Amsterdam-Zurich
- Economy
- Successful claim
- Frankfurt-Accra
- Economy
Jennifer V
Sarasota-Entebbe
Economy
failure to comply with Montreal convention
I am writing to formally dispute the partial reimbursement issued for my delayed baggage claim. My baggage was delayed for two days, during which I incurred necessary and reasonable expenses totaling $197 USD. I submitted itemized receipts for these essential purchases. KLM has offered reimbursement of $115 USD, which does not cover the documented costs I incurred as a direct result of the delay. Under the Montreal Convention (Article 17 and related provisions), passengers are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable and necessary expenses caused by delayed baggage. This obligation is not subject to internal airline policy or discretionary reduction when expenses are properly documented and justified. The items I purchased were essential given the duration of the delay, and no explanation has been provided as to why any portion of my claim has been deemed unreasonable or excluded. I am therefore requesting: β’ Full reimbursement of the remaining $82 USD, and β’ A clear explanation if any specific item is being disputed, including the basis for that determination. If this matter cannot be resolved promptly, I will escalate the complaint to the U.S. Department of Transportation and pursue recovery through formal channels. I would appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and a resolution consistent with your obligations under international air passenger regulations. Sincerely, Jennifer Verdolin C-11163740Overall
failure to comply with Montreal Convention
- Sarasota-Entebbe
- Economy
- Loss: β¬197
- Desired solution
Expenses reimbursement
- Quito-Dubai
- Economy
No reason given
KLM has cancelled KL428 flight. they sent me notification 3 days ahead. Then they re-booked me on low cost carrier Fly Dubai which had 5hrs delay at landing in Bucharest Otopeni. By KLM DXB-AMS and AMS-OTP I was expecting to land at 13:20hrs in Bucharest then have 5hrs until connecting flight. Therefore I made an appointment in Bucharest as I wanted to use my connecting hours. Due to the fact KLM has re-booked me on Fly Dubai FZ1797 this flight had 5 hrs delay therefore I missed my appointment. For that I had to make a new appointment at a later date and had to use my personal car to drive doen to Bucharest at my own cost. The fuel cost was 202RON for which I want to claim reimbursement.- Dubai-Cluj-napoca
- Economy
- Madrid-Amsterdam
- Economy
- Successful claim
- Cork-Mahebourg
- Economy













View more